ShareThis Page

Fayette County assistant public defender killed in house fire

Paul Peirce
| Sunday, Nov. 12, 2017, 9:12 a.m.
Mary Campbell Spegar (right) walks out of Courtroom No. 5 at the Fayette County Courthouse after a hearing in April 2003 in Uniontown, Pa.
Tribune-Review
Mary Campbell Spegar (right) walks out of Courtroom No. 5 at the Fayette County Courthouse after a hearing in April 2003 in Uniontown, Pa.

A longtime assistant public defender in Fayette County was identified Sunday as the victim of a fatal house fire in rural Wharton Township.

State police in Uniontown reported Mary Campbell Spegar, 54, was pronounced dead at the scene of the fire at her home on Old Mill Road.

Police said the cause remains under investigation by the state police fire marshal but it is not believed to be suspicious. The fire was reported at 7:26 a.m.

Police said the home was fully engulfed when firefighters arrived. It was reported by a neighbor, authorities reported.

Public Defender Jeffrey Whiteko said Spegar worked in the office for more than 20 years.

“I can tell you that we're really going to miss her. It's such a tragedy and so sad ... she was such a nice person,” Whiteko said.

Whiteko said Spegar was dedicated to her clients.

“Mary was such a hard worker. And it didn't matter if it was a homicide case or a bike theft, she gave each case her all,” Whiteko said.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2860, ppeirce@tribweb.com or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.