ShareThis Page
Regional

State regulators remind residents of upcoming hearings on Duquesne Light rate increase request

Brian C. Rittmeyer
| Tuesday, June 5, 2018, 3:51 p.m.

Two public hearings are coming up on a rate increase requested by Duquesne Light.

The state Public Utility Commission will hold the hearings in Pittsburgh and Big Beaver Township on June 14.

The commission voted in April to investigate the company's distribution rate increase request. Duquesne Light has proposed an $81.6 million annual increase to customers, or 16.13 percent.

Under the request, the monthly electric bill for an average residential customer using 600 kilowatt-hours per month would increase from $98.15 to $106.80, an increase of 8.82 percent.

An average commercial customer using 10,000 kilowatt-hours would increase from $984.94 to $1,013.71, or 2.92 percent; an average industrial customer using 200,000 kilowatt-hours would increase from $18,730.50 to $19,165.27, a 2.32 percent increase.

The request was suspended for seven months while the commission determines what, if any, of the requested increases are justified. The commission must issue a final decision by Dec. 20.

Duquesne Light provides electric distribution service to nearly 600,000 residential and business customers in Allegheny and Beaver counties.

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-226-4701, brittmeyer@tribweb.com or on Twitter @BCRittmeyer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me