ShareThis Page

Engineers to discuss new Brentwood municipal building

| Tuesday, Nov. 29, 2016, 5:39 p.m.

Brentwood Council has scheduled representatives of HHSDR Architects/Engineers of Pittsburgh and Public Financial Management to speak at the Dec. 12 council meeting about designs and paying for a new municipal building.

A new building, estimated to cost $5 million, would be constructed in the parking area next to the current building, which would be torn down to make way for a new parking lot.

Borough leaders long have been considering options to renovate or replace the current, century-old building on Brownsville Road. Council President John Frombach said Monday that a full renovation is estimated to cost $6 million.

When council gave preliminary approval on Nov. 21 to the $16 million budget, officials budgeted $235,000 for architectural design and bid documents for a new municipal building.

The proposed budget keeps the property tax rate at 10 mills.

Also included in the budget are improvements at the community swimming pool.

Phase I of the upgrades won't start until after the summer swimming season ends on Labor Day.

Estimates for this phase, which includes a new liner, concrete, decking and a zero-entry area, are $714,000. The borough received a $175,000 matching grant from the Allegheny County Community Infrastructure and Tourism Fund, which comes from casino revenue. Borough officials have earmarked money in both the 2017 and 2018 capital fund for the project because not all of Phase I will be completed in 2017.

Council opted to transfer $100,000 from the road program to help with pool costs. Council dedicated $400,000 to pave and repair borough roads in 2017.

Borough Manager George Zboyovsky said borough officials do not anticipate any streets scheduled for work to be affected because of the reduced amount.

The budget is available for public review before it receives final approval on Dec. 12.

Jim Spezialetti is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-388-5805 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.