ShareThis Page

UPMC says no hospital for South Fayette, will explore South Hills

| Thursday, Sept. 21, 2017, 8:03 p.m.
The UPMC logo on U.S. Steel Tower in Downtown Pittsburgh.
Justin Merriman | Tribune-Review
The UPMC logo on U.S. Steel Tower in Downtown Pittsburgh.

UPMC said Thursday it is backing away from its plan to construct a community hospital in South Fayette.

Spokeswoman Gloria Kreps declined to discuss the South Fayette facility, but did say UPMC was not moving forward with the hospital in the Newbury Market development near Bridgeville.

"UPMC is pursuing other, more significant strategic options to advance the innovations in care and the cures that we provide to our patients and that are rapidly accelerating, including living-donor liver transplantation and immunotherapy treatments for cancer, aging, and vision restoration," Kreps said. "We will soon announce more specific plans of a sophisticated set of facilities to better serve our patients."

The South Fayette Commissioners gave initial approval for the $200 million, 90-bed project in August .

Kreps said UPMC is evaluating several sites in South Hills for a new hospital, which would offer emergency, intensive care, surgery and inpatient and outpatient services.

The hospital would serve patients "who already choose UPMC physicians and facilities as their preferred providers," she wrote in a statement.

UPMC had previously explored the South Hills and had planned to construct of a hospital along Route 51 in Pleasant Hills. It backed away from those plans in September 2016.

Jeff Domenick is an assistant news editor for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. Reach him at or via Twitter @jeff_domenick.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.