ShareThis Page

West Jefferson Hills bags plan for softball field at new high school

| Thursday, Oct. 5, 2017, 2:09 p.m.
Officials in 2015 survey the site of the future campus of Thomas Jefferson High School in the West Jefferson Hills School District.
Randy Jarosz | For Trib Total Media
Officials in 2015 survey the site of the future campus of Thomas Jefferson High School in the West Jefferson Hills School District.

West Jefferson Hills School District leaders have axed plans to build a softball field at the $95 million Thomas Jefferson High School, set to open in the summer.

Instead, they plan to improve the existing softball and baseball fields, while crafting a long-term plan for the district's athletic facilities.

“The long-term plan would be to have all of our athletics where the high school is, but we want to do it right and we want to do it as part of a whole plan,” Superintendent Michael Ghilani said.

Board members at a Sept. 26 meeting voted unanimously to accept a quote of $48,310 for renovation of the district's softball field at the high school complex. They also accepted a $135,852 quote for renovation of the baseball field at Jefferson Elementary School. Athletic Field Pros is the company doing the renovations.

The softball field was the only athletic facility planned for construction at the new high school.

The football stadium, constructed in 2001-02, will remain at the high school on Old Clairton Road, about a mile from the 161-acre site where the new school is being built.

Initial architectural drawings included sketches of a stadium and athletic complex at the new school. That vision could be addressed later, possibly in 15 to 20 years, Ghilani said.

Plans for the softball field at the new school included a “very basic design, with very little infrastructure,” Ghilani said.

“It was a fence and two benches. Very basic,” he said. “The dugouts were literally a bench with a fence wrapped around it with a tin roof over it, which would give parents access,” Ghilani said. “I mean, literally, parents could be surrounding the bench talking to their kids as the game is going on. So there's safety concerns. There were just so many concerns with that field.”

The superintendent said it made the most fiscal sense to put the $66,346 that would have been spent on that field into the current facilities to make improvements.

“We felt the fiscally responsible thing to do in the somewhat short term was to renovate both of those fields so that they have proper draining. They were never property installed,” he said. “The company that we're bringing in to renovate both fields – they've done PNC Park, they've done Heinz Field, but they've also done a lot of other projects.”

Board members at a special meeting last week approved hiring Core Architects to conduct a feasibility study that will include a long-term plan for athletic facilities in the district.

“Then, I think we can reasonably turn our attention to looking at our athletic program and athletic facility and how we can upgrade that as part of that plan.” Ghilani said. “Ultimately, we'd like to do our athletic complex the right way.”

Stephanie Hacke is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.