ShareThis Page

Election Day: Baldwin-Whitehall, Brentwood, West Jefferson Hills results

| Tuesday, Nov. 7, 2017, 8:51 p.m.

Results from Brentwood, Baldwin-Whitehall and West Jefferson Hills school board races are posted below.

Unofficial results from the Allegheny County Elections Division are posted below. Results are unofficial until verified by elections division officials.

Baldwin-Whitehall

Board President Karen Brown was the highest vote-getter in Tuesday's general election for Brentwood School Board.

“I am happy to be part of a group that will continue to serve the community,” Brown said Tuesday night after the election.

None of the Brentwood seats were contested as four people were up for election in four seats.

School board (vote for 4)

Karen Brown: 4,471

Louise Mancuso Wolf: 4,299

David Solenday: 4,336

Gerald Pantone: 4,236

Brentwood

Four incumbents on the Brentwood School Board were re-elected Tuesday night in an uncontested race.

“I hope to serve the people of Brentwood to the best of my abilities,” Gary Topolosky said Tuesday night.

School board (vote for 4)

Donna Werner: 980

Kristie Kraeuter: 992

Dale Johnson: 881

Gary Topolosky: 861

West Jefferson Hills

Kimberley Finnerty and Kristin Shoemaker were the top two vote-getters in Tuesday night's election. Christopher Zacur and John Hosmer rounded out the the last two seats for school board.

“I am anxious to work with the new and current school board members to continue to make West Jefferson Hills great,” Shoemaker said.

School board (vote for 4)

Kimberley Finnerty: 2,484

Kristin Shoemaker: 2,411

Christopher Zacur: 2,333

John Hosmer: 1,853

Anna Louise Lilley: 1,671

Suzanne Elliott is a Tribune-Review staff writer. She can be reached at selliott@tribweb.com or 412-871-2346.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.