ShareThis Page

Election Day: Results from South Hills municipalities

| Tuesday, Nov. 7, 2017, 8:51 p.m.

Here is a look at election results are in from Baldwin Borough, Baldwin Township, Brentwood, Jefferson Hills, Pleasant Hills and Whitehall.

Unofficial results from the Allegheny County Elections Division are posted below. Results are unofficial until verified by elections division officials.

Brentwood

Mayor

Dennis Troy: 824

Council (four seats)

A.J. Doyle: 959

Jennifer George: 925

Robert Pasquantino: 832

John Frombach: 743

Mary Vetere: 512

Baldwin Borough

Mayor

David Depretis: 2,163

Council (vote for 4)

Marianne Conley: 2,120

Chad Hurka: 1,939

Francis Scott: 1,739

E. John Egger: 1,722

Robert Ieraci: 1,249

Baldwin Township

There are two seats up for election on the Baldwin Township commission and three people are running for them including incumbents John Paravati and Eileen Frisoli. They are being challenged by Robert Downey Jr.

Council

Eileen Frisoli: 234

Robert Downey Jr.: 258

John Paravati: 177

Jefferson Hills

Council (vote for 4)

Francis Sockman: 1,295

David Montgomery: 1,295

Christopher King: 1,193

Vickie Lynn Ielease: 902

Gregg Daily: 879

Pleasant Hills

Mayor

William Trimbath: 1,272

Council (four seats)

Marian Haley: 1,176

Cheryl Lee Freedman: 1,087

Jeffrey Soloman: 842

Robert Karcher: 758

Regis Brown: 677

Council (one seat)

Marian Haley: 846

Cheryl Lee Freedman: 600

Whitehall

Mayor

Jim Nowalk: 1,840

Julie Mancine: 651

Council (vote for 4)

John Wotus: 1,634

Kathy Depuy: 1,563

William Veith: 1,253

Linda Book: 1,239

Alexa Mihalko: 1,079

Thomas Gregory Kelley: 1,016

Chris Mooney: 970

Theodore Mueskes Jr.: 754

Suzanne Elliott is a Tribune-Review staff writer. She can be reached at selliott@tribweb.com or 412-871-2346.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.