ShareThis Page

Springdale engineer recommends borough building, garage repairs

| Thursday, April 20, 2017, 11:35 p.m.

Two buildings owned by Springdale Borough need repairs, and one may have to be replaced.

Borough Engineer Gordon Taylor of Senate Engineering said that a corner of the borough building's basement needs to be shored up because of water damage.

It happened to be raining the day he viewed the damage, Taylor said.

“You could see the water puddling outside the building, and the sidewalk outside had sunk and the water was flowing toward the building,” Taylor told council Tuesday.

That part of the basement is used for storage, borough officials said.

Steel joists holding up the first floor have been corroded by the influx of water, he said.

He's uncertain what it will cost to repair or replace the joists.

“We have to come out and look at it better,” Taylor said. “Structurally, it is fine.”

The borough garage at the bottom of Colfax Street needs more immediate attention, Taylor said.

A load-bearing wall has been badly damaged by water, as well, but from the roof down.

Taylor said the building, built in the 1920s or 30s, never had any gutters or downspouts. He said for decades, the water has just come off the roof and down into the wall.

“Something should be done within the year,” he told council. “It's completely shot.”

Taylor agreed with a suggestion by Council President James Zurisko that the borough should install jacks and supporting timbers to hold up the wall as a temporary repair.

“It doesn't look like it is going to fall any time soon,” Taylor said, adding that the temporary repair shouldn't cost that much.

Meanwhile, council asked him to come up with an estimate of what a new building might cost.

Tom Yerace is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.