ShareThis Page

New sewage treatment plant in Freeport may more than triple customers' bills

| Tuesday, Sept. 5, 2017, 10:21 p.m.

Freeport Borough is preparing to forge ahead on its new sewage treatment plant, and residents' monthly bill could more than triple.

The $11.6 million facility will replace the aging plant that has become outmoded, including pipes that are too narrow.

Under what council said Tuesday night was a “worst-case scenario,” a typical monthly sewage bill could be about $112.

Residents currently pay about $33 a month. The new project could cost each of the 850 customers about another $79 monthly for the $112 total.

Officials said if grants are obtained from PennVEST and other sources, that user rate would be lowered.

The state Department of Environmental Protection is reviewing the design. By Sept. 15, the design is expected to be returned to Freeport for council and Armstrong County planning officials to review.

The borough plans to advertise a 30-day public comment period for October.

A public hearing will be scheduled for the second or third week of October at a site to be determined. The Combined Sewage Overflow plan will also be discussed.

The public comments will be addressed during November. On Dec. 1, plans and comments will be submitted to the state for final approval.

Phase I will include an agreement to accept diverted run-off from the Norfolk Southern railroad tracks and the borough will take out a loan for that project portion.

Solicitor Gerald DeAngelis said $5,000 is needed just for the licensure agreement with the railroad.

As for Phase II — the actual plant construction — Freeport would largely seek state and federal grants.

Freeport officials recently voted to build a new treatment plant rather than connect iwth the Upper Allegheny Joint Sanitary Authority system in Harrison.

Officials said earlier that doing so would have only been about $4 per a month per customer cheaper than building a new treatment plant.

George Guido is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.