ShareThis Page

Trio accused of kidnapping and assaulting a woman in Arnold are headed to trial

Matthew Medsger
| Thursday, Sept. 21, 2017, 5:09 p.m.
Michael Battaglia, Devon Hamilton and Stephanie Unruh
Westmoreland County Prison
Michael Battaglia, Devon Hamilton and Stephanie Unruh
Angel Mangol says she was kidnapped and beaten in an Arnold home. A cigarette burn she says she suffered in the attack is visible on her chest. Sept. 14, 2017
Chuck Biedka | Tribune-Review
Angel Mangol says she was kidnapped and beaten in an Arnold home. A cigarette burn she says she suffered in the attack is visible on her chest. Sept. 14, 2017

A New Kensington woman accused with two others of kidnapping and torturing another woman said the charges against her are false and she was just in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Stephanie Renee Unruh, 30, of Victoria Avenue, New Kensington, said she hardly knows the other defendants and the alleged victim is making up the incident.

Unruh is accused, along with Michael Joseph Battaglia, 41, of 16th Street, Arnold, and Devon Hamilton, 25, of Clay Avenue, Mt. Pleasant of kidnapping to inflict injury or terror and aggravated assault.

The three waived their right to a preliminary hearing on Thursday and will be arraigned in front of Westmoreland County Judge Rita Hathaway on November 21.

Police accuse the defendants of kidnapping Angel Mangol , 21, no permanent address, on Sept. 9. According to arrest papers, the three "stripped her of her clothes and dragged her downstairs to the basement."

Mangol allegedly was tied to a post and repeatedly punched in the head and face by Battaglia, before the three also struck her in the head with a broom handle.

The victim told police the three left, and she was able to untie herself and hide in the basement briefly until they came back and found her, only to tie her up with a rope around her neck, torso, arms and legs.

Mangol said Hamilton used a lit cigarette to burn her chest.

According to police, the three again left the woman alone and she fell asleep. On Sunday morning, Mangol was able to get free and run to a neighbor's house, police said.

However, according to Unruh, the charges levied against the three defendants were completely fabricated by Mangol, who she said had been dating Battaglia until just before the alleged incident occurred.

"I barely know (Battaglia), I only met him a couple of times. I just happened to be there that evening and I think (Mangol) just wanted his house to herself and that's why she's been doing all of this," Unruh said.

Unruh further claimed Mangol has been staying in Battaglia's residence since his arrest and without his permission.

As he was entering the courtroom on Thursday, Battaglia said, "I didn't do nothing."

Mary Lasko, 47, of New Kensington, said she has known Battaglia for years, and, though he has at times struggled with addiction, she said he isn't the kind of person that Mangol alleges.

"Michael wouldn't do that. And, if he had punched her in the face, her whole face would have been broken," Lasko said.

Hamilton and Battaglia are being held in the Westmoreland County Prison in lieu of a $50,000 bond each. Unruh was released on bond shortly after her arrest.

Mangol, who was present for Thursday's scheduled hearing, rushed into the district judge's office without speaking to reporters.

Matthew Medsger is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-226-4675, mmedsger@tribweb.com, or on Twitter @matthew_medsger.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.