ShareThis Page
Valley News Dispatch

Freeport Council chooses new member

| Wednesday, Feb. 7, 2018, 1:57 p.m.

Onetime Freeport police Officer Dino DiGiacobbe now is a councilman in the borough.

DiGiacobbe, 54, a New Kensington police officer, was appointed by council in a 5-0 vote Monday to replace Richard Hastings. Councilman John Mazurowski was absent.

Hastings was re-elected to council in November but resigned before starting his new, four-year term.

Under municipal law, DiGiacobbe's appointment will last until Dec. 31, 2019. DiGiacobbe and other interested candidates would have to run for the final two years of Hastings' term.

A 1982 Freeport High School graduate, DiGiacobbe served as a part-time police officer in Freeport for about 15 years after serving in the Army in the 82nd Airborne Division. He also was a maintenance department foreman at Alle­gheny Ludlum, now Allegheny Technologies Inc., in Harrison before entering police work full time in New Kensington in 2002.

“I liked the guys at Alle­gheny Ludlum, but I realized police work was my first love,” DiGiacobbe said. “I bought my parents' old house in Freeport. I've never held (political) office, but I thought this would be my civic duty.”

DiGiacobbe, the only applicant for the council vacancy, will be sworn in before the Feb. 26 meeting.

George Guido is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me