ShareThis Page
Valley News Dispatch

McCabe, Brooks to square off in November in 54th state House district

Chuck Biedka
| Wednesday, May 16, 2018, 12:06 a.m.
Democrat Jonathan Paul McCabe (left) will face longtime Republican Murrysville Mayor Robert J. Brooks in a November election race to represent the 54th state House district, based on unofficial results from Tuesday’s primary elections.
Democrat Jonathan Paul McCabe (left) will face longtime Republican Murrysville Mayor Robert J. Brooks in a November election race to represent the 54th state House district, based on unofficial results from Tuesday’s primary elections.
Bob Brooks
Bob Brooks
Jonathan McCabe
Jonathan McCabe

Democrat Jonathan Paul McCabe will face longtime Republican Murrysville Mayor Robert J. Brooks in a November election race to represent the 54th state House district, based on unofficial results from Tuesday's primary elections.

With 95.6 percent of Pennsylvania's voting precincts reporting, McCabe, 22, had collected almost 65.8 percent of the votes counted compared with Democratic opponent Robert Andrew Bertha's 34.2 percent, unofficial tallies showed.

On the GOP side, Brooks, 74, had 35 percent of the votes counted to lead the four-way Republican race. Michael T. Korns Jr., 36, an attorney from Murrysville, was in second with 26.6 percent of the votes.

The 54th state House district includes areas in Westmoreland and Allegheny counties, including all of West Deer, Fawn, Lower Burrell, Upper Burrell, Murrysville and Export and parts of Harrison, Allegheny, Penn and Hempfield townships. The district had about 20,000 registered Republicans, about 18,500 registered Democrats and about 5,000 voters registered in other parties or as independents, state records show.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-226-4711, cbiedka@tribweb.com or via Twitter @ChuckBiedka.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me