ShareThis Page

Latrobe parking authority to consider disbanding

| Tuesday, Nov. 29, 2016, 11:00 p.m.

Time is set to expire for Latrobe's parking authority. At a Dec. 14 special meeting, its board will consider disbanding to save the city money.

The plan is to fold the authority's responsibilities into those of the city government, city Manager Wayne Jones said. City council and state officials would have to approve the authority's termination.

“We're going to eliminate duplication of costs,” Jones said. “They have attorney fees, and they have their own audit, a lot of things we could marry with ours.”

While the city oversees on-street parking, the authority has charge of several off-street lots and a parking garage on Weldon Street that was renovated with $3 million in bonds the city issued in 2012.

Council recently refinanced the parking garage bonds, saving about $300,000 through lower interest rates.

The authority has been a good steward of parking assets and has met payments on the garage financing, Jones said. But the authority has been unable to reimburse the city for the work its staff does to help operate off-street parking.

“A lot of the maintenance was done by the city, and a portion of the billing was done by the city,” Jones said. “The loss is internal, but it's still a loss.”

Eliminating the authority as a separate entity will save about $25,000 annually, roughly offsetting that loss, Jones projected.

With the end of the authority, the parking lots would be transferred to the city at no cost, Jones said.

“It's a pretty painless process,” he said.

While authority revenue has been thin, Jones said council's parking committee has more options it can consider for generating funds. That includes reviewing meter fees and whether on-street spaces should be metered.

“We're going to have to review the whole (parking) operation,” he said.

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-6622 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.