ShareThis Page

Drug ring crackdown leads to 4 more arrests in Westmoreland

| Thursday, Feb. 16, 2017, 4:27 p.m.

Four more people have been charged in connection with a large-scale heroin trafficking ring that police say operated in Westmoreland County.

On Thursday, police arrested Tim K. Tarr, 31, of New Stanton. Arrest warrants have been issued for Laura A. Mitchell, 51, of New Stanton, and Allen Richard Smith, 52, and Mark G. Hall, 41, both of Greensburg.

All are accused of involvement in the ring that state police and county detectives believe operated for six to eight months, bringing an estimated 20 bricks of heroin weekly into the county for distribution.

Seven people have been arrested in connection with the ring that authorities allege was led by Chauncey Lamar Bray, 27, of Jeannette. Bray was arrested Feb. 1 along with Kellie Lee Hays, 55, of Youngwood, and Ryan Nathaniel Meyers, 22, of Jeannette.

All seven suspects are charged with conspiracy to commit corrupt organizations and drug delivery. Bray and Hays additionally are charged with corrupt organizations. Police allege Bray and others delivered 36 bricks of heroin between Dec. 31 and late January to the others, according to court papers.

Tarr was placed in the Westmoreland County Prison on $250,000 bond. Bray, Meyers and Hays are all being held there. Preliminary hearings for Meyers and Tarr are set for Feb. 28.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.