ShareThis Page

Hempfield students' racist video being investigated by police

| Monday, March 20, 2017, 8:45 p.m.

State police are investigating allegations of racial intimidation and harassment after at least one West Hempfield Middle School student appeared in a racist video posted to Twitter.

In the video, boys of middle- and elementary-school age dance and make obscene gestures at the camera while a homemade rap song plays, calling the song's target “the whitest black man I know.”

In the opening shot, one boy wears what appears to be a crude Klansman's hood made of paper while another waves a toy gun. The participants in the video are white.

“Our school police officer ... is in the process of investigating to determine the identity of all the students involved,” Hempfield Area School District Superintendent Barbara Marin wrote in a statement posted to the district's website Monday. “This has been turned over to the ... police. We will not tolerate this type of racial intimidation and harassment.”

Marin said the district learned of the video early Monday morning and spent all day working with the West Hempfield principal to identify at least one of the boys in the video as a student at the school. Others came from other middle and elementary schools, Marin said.

“The video was not filmed on school property; it was done at home by these students,” she said. “I can't count the number of phone calls and emails we've received over this. We're cooperating with the investigation.”

Matthew Santoni is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724 836 6660 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.