ShareThis Page

Hempfield Area OKs tax increase

| Monday, June 19, 2017, 11:00 p.m.

The Hempfield Area School Board on Monday night passed a budget for next school year that will raise property taxes 2.47 mills.

Officials blamed the hike on increases in the amount the district will pay in state pension funds and salaries.

The real estate tax hike is Hempfield's ninth in 12 years.

The $95.75 million budget raises the property tax to 82.21 mills from 79.74 mills.

Hempfield's budget adoption comes at a time when similar hikes are being made in neighboring districts, officials said.

“Where we're maybe a little bit better off than some districts,” Business Manager Wayne Wismar said, “is we're not furloughing this year, we're not reducing programs, (and) we're not increasing class sizes.”

The vote was unanimous.

Officials reviewed a recent survey conducted by the Pennsylvania Association of School Board Administrators and the Pennsylvania Association of School Business Officials.

It found 15 percent of surveyed districts plan to furlough employees in the next school year. That same survey found that 43 percent of respondents felt that their school's financial situation would worsen in that span.

Without the tax increase, the district forecast a deficit of just over $2 million for next school year.

When accounting for the increase, the deficit is forecast at a little more than $570,000, and should be covered by the school's $6.58 million fund balance.

Matthew Guerry is a Tribune-Review staff writer.

Editor's note: This story has been updated since it was first published online.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.