ShareThis Page

New Derry militia leader: Charlottesville presence an effort to be 'pro-government,' free speech

Matthew Santoni
| Tuesday, Aug. 15, 2017, 6:12 p.m.
Christian Yingling of New Derry, leader of an anti-government militia, posts this photograph on his Facebook page. Militia members from around the east were at Saturday's deadly clash in Charlottesville to keep the peace between white supremacists and counter-protesters and protect everyone's free-speech rights, Yingling said.
Christian Yingling of New Derry, leader of an anti-government militia, posts this photograph on his Facebook page. Militia members from around the east were at Saturday's deadly clash in Charlottesville to keep the peace between white supremacists and counter-protesters and protect everyone's free-speech rights, Yingling said.

A New Derry militia leader says his group's efforts to “keep the peace” at a Charlottesville white-supremacist rally were part of a push to protect free-speech rights and move the image of militias beyond that of the anti-government conspiracy theorists of the 1990s.

Christian Yingling, leader of the Pennsylvania Light Foot Militia, led a contingent of 32 armed militia members from Pennsylvania, New York and elsewhere to stand in a line Saturday outside Emancipation Park in Charlottesville, Va., where white supremacist groups planned a “Unite the Right” rally.

The militia's intent was not to support or specifically protect the white supremacists but to stop clashes between them and counter-protesters in the name of ensuring all sides had the opportunity to peacefully demonstrate, Yingling said.

“If we're to call ourselves militia and preach about the Constitution, we'll have to stand up for the rights of people we don't necessarily believe in,” Yingling told the Tribune-Review on Tuesday. “We are pro-government, very pro-government; we're anti-corrupt-government.”

Though Yingling forcefully denounced the white supremacists at the rally and said many militia groups stayed away because they didn't want to be associated with that ideology, he said his idea of the militia acting as protectors of free speech started in discussions with another militia leader about anti-fascist, or “antifa,” protesters shutting down right-wing speakers and rallies.

The two leaders came to the conclusion that the militias should step in to protect free speech, even if it's hateful or unpopular, Yingling said.

He and other members of the Pennsylvania militia had participated in similar “peacekeeping” roles at an anti-Sharia rally in Harrisburg and in response to threats that antifa activists would attack Confederate memorials in Gettysburg on July 1.

Anti-fascist ideology holds that pro-fascist speech should be denied any platform and blocked by any means before it takes root or gains legitimacy, putting its proponents at odds with the militia's goal of letting all sides be heard.

“There is no neutral peacekeeping. You either fight fascism or you enable it,” said Alexander Berkman of the Pittsburgh Student Solidarity Coalition.

Counter-protester Heather Heyer, 32, was killed Saturday when police say suspected white supremacist James Fields Jr. drove his car into a crowd. Two state police officers died when their helicopter crashed while flying in support of police response to the clashes.

State police said the militia members weren't the only ones carrying firearms at the protest, a consequence of Virginia's open-carry laws. Yingling said he tried to distinguish his people from the armed protesters through their actions: using physical force only when separating people in a fight, checking on all participants once they were separated and directing them to medics if necessary. He said none of the militia fired or pointed their weapons, and he denied reports that they threw punches to break up fights.

Yingling disagreed with the Southern Poverty Law Center's categorization of the Pennsylvania Light Foot Militia as one of 998 “extreme anti-government groups” active in the United States as of 2015, saying that militia personnel and mindset had changed over the years.

“We absolutely, unequivocally believe in our form of government, when it is practiced by people who are true and honest,” he said. “We aren't the paranoid conspiracy theorists of the '90s. We don't go out and train to fight the government.”

He also took issue with the police response in Charlottesville, noting that officers from the city and Virginia State Police didn't get involved in the clashes until after state police warned the militia to leave and then shut down the planned rally. Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe said militia members “had better equipment than our state police” and may have influenced officers' decision not to move in earlier.

In a news conference Monday, Charlottesville police Chief Al Thomas said city officers had deployed in their normal uniforms, with plans to stay between sides that had agreed to enter the park along pre-arranged routes. He denied that officers held back from engagement because of the armed militia and protesters, but when people showed up from all directions with guns, shields, clubs and other weapons, officers had to change into riot gear and get state police to take the lead in clearing the park.

“We were certainly not intimidated by the firepower,” Thomas said. “However, it was prudent to make sure our officers were equipped to go out and deal with the violence at hand.”

Yingling said he was still recovering days after the event and had no immediate plans to return to Charlottesville or other protests — particularly “free speech” actions planned Saturday for Google offices around the country, including in Pittsburgh, after an engineer was fired for writing a controversial anti-diversity memo.

Matthew Santoni is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-6660, msantoni@tribweb.com or via Twitter @msantoni.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.