ShareThis Page

Greensburg police foil alleged shoplifters' aluminum-lined bag scheme

Paul Peirce
| Wednesday, Aug. 16, 2017, 2:00 p.m.
Greensburg police charged Earl M. Davis of Pittsburgh with shoplifting using an aluminum foil-lined bag on Aug. 16, 2017.
Greensburg police charged Earl M. Davis of Pittsburgh with shoplifting using an aluminum foil-lined bag on Aug. 16, 2017.
Greensburg police charged Taelyn T. Rose of Pittsburgh with shoplifting using an aluminum foil-lined bag on Aug. 16, 2017.
Greensburg police charged Taelyn T. Rose of Pittsburgh with shoplifting using an aluminum foil-lined bag on Aug. 16, 2017.

A Pittsburgh couple's alleged shoplifting scheme was foiled Tuesday when Greensburg police said they found an aluminum-lined shopping bag in their car filled with more than $3,350 worth of clothing stolen from area stores.

Earl M. Davis and Taelyn T. Rose, both 18, of Pittsburgh were charged with receiving stolen property and possessing instruments of theft after police discovered the clothing in the trunk of Davis' Toyota sedan when it was searched.

Davis also is charged with possession of a small amount of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia. Rose is charged with providing police with false identification and corruption of minors because two teen girls in the car allegedly helped her steal the clothing, police said.

The couple's bickering as they drove through the city first tipped off police, according to the chain of events detailed in an affidavit.

Patrolman Kenneth Burke reported he saw the car driving erratically and made a traffic stop at 8:48 p.m. at the intersection of Fulton and Tremont streets. He found the registration was suspended because of no insurance, according to the affidavit of probable cause filed before District Judge James Albert.

One of the teens told Burke that Davis was driving erratically because she and Davis were arguing.

The vehicle smelled like marijuana, so Burke summoned the city's K9, he said in the affidavit.

“During the search of the vehicle, officers were able to locate in the trunk of the vehicle $3,351 worth of merchandise that had been stolen from various stores. Also located in the vehicle was a theft detection shielding device, which was a plastic shopping bag lined with aluminum foil,” Burke wrote in the affidavit.

Burke said one marijuana cigarette also was in the bag.

An aluminum-foil lined bag is a common theft detection shielding device, Burke reported.

Shoplifters build a “booster bag” by lining a brand-name store shopping bag with as many as 30 layers of aluminum foil to block radio communication from security devices on clothing, according to the blog “Common Thief.”

Police are taking an inventory of the clothing to determine the stores where the items were stolen.

Rose has similar charges of retail theft and possessing instruments of theft pending in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court filed by West Mifflin police. She pleaded guilty this year to retail theft complaints filed by police in Ross, according to online records.

Preliminary hearings in the Westmoreland County case are scheduled for Aug. 24 before Albert.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2860, ppeirce@tribweb.com or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.