ShareThis Page

Irwin fireman, police officers rescue man from apartment blaze

Paul Peirce
| Thursday, Aug. 17, 2017, 5:03 a.m.

Three Irwin policemen and a borough fireman are credited with rescuing a 63-year-old man from his burning apartment at a popular tavern Wednesday.

Off-duty officer and firefighter Scott Urias, firefighter R.J. Swenson and officers Adam Painter and Daniel Wensel entered a burning apartment above Frank & Tucci's tavern at 211 Oak St. and carried James Gehrling to safety, authorities said.

Police said the cause of the fire was Gehrling smoking in bed, and his mattress caught fire.

After Gehrling was pulled from the flames, he was taken by ambulance to UPMC Mercy Hospital in Pittsburgh. He is recuperating “from severe burns to his legs,” Wensel said.

According to a police report, Wensel was on patrol in the area around 5:30 p.m. when he noticed a man with a fire extinguisher running around a corner outside the tavern. Wensel called Painter, who was on patrol nearby, and they quickly located the blaze in one of the apartments.

Painter and Wensel entered the building but couldn't find the source of the fire because of heavy smoke and were forced to retreat. Urias and Swenson were among the first firefighters to arrive and were equipped with protective fire gear and breathing apparatus, according to a police report.

Urias and Swenson went into the building and quickly located the source of the blaze, Wensel said.

“Gehrling was found in his apartment, lying in his bed. ... The mattress was on fire,” he said.

Urias and Swenson were able to extinguish the flames and, with Painter and Wensel's help, carried Gehrling from the building.

Painter and Wensel were examined at the scene by Irwin Ambulance personnel because of “minor lung irritation from breathing in smoke,” Wensel said.

Firefighters from several neighboring departments also responded to the blaze.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2860, or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.