ShareThis Page

Greensburg man got mail — 5 pounds of suspected pot, police say

Renatta Signorini
| Wednesday, Sept. 13, 2017, 11:42 a.m.
Marijuana plants. (File photo)
Getty Images
Marijuana plants. (File photo)

A postal inspector suspicious of a 7-pound package led to the discovery of a marijuana shipment allegedly destined for a Greensburg man's home, according to court papers.

John Patrick Henigan, 24, was arrested Tuesday on drug and related offenses after police said he opened the package when it was delivered to his St. Clair Avenue home.

Greensburg police were notified Friday of a suspicious package that a postal inspector believed was marijuana, according to a criminal complaint. Investigators obtained a search warrant and said they found 5 pounds of suspected marijuana inside the package addressed to “J. Henigen.” Police placed a device inside that would notify them when the package was opened and resealed it, according to the complaint.

On Monday, the package was delivered to Henigan. Police were alerted that it had been opened, and they confiscated the package from a hiding spot in a clothes dryer along with brass knuckles and a marijuana grinder from Henigan's bedroom, according to the complaint.

Henigan told investigators that he was not a drug dealer and that he leaves his home when he is notified that a package is set to arrive and returns to find an envelope with cash waiting for him, according to the complaint.

He could not be reached for comment and did not have an attorney listed in online court records.

Henigan was arraigned Tuesday on charges of possession with intent to deliver, criminal use of a communication facility, prohibited offensive weapons, marijuana and drug possession and possession of drug paraphernalia. He is free on $15,000 unsecured bond. A preliminary hearing is set for Sept. 21.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-837-5374, or via Twitter @byrenatta.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.