ShareThis Page

Franklin Regional to consider bond issue for Sloan elementary campus project

Patrick Varine
| Monday, Sept. 18, 2017, 8:30 p.m.
The Franklin Regional School District will restructure elementary grade groupings and build an additional elementary school on the Sloan Elementary campus, as shown in this drawing.
Source: VEBH Architects
The Franklin Regional School District will restructure elementary grade groupings and build an additional elementary school on the Sloan Elementary campus, as shown in this drawing.

Franklin Regional School District taxpayers will get a better sense next month of how much school officials plan to spend on a new elementary campus.

Board members Monday night authorized PFM Financial Advisors and the Pittsburgh law firm Lynch & Lynch to work with district administrators on a bond issuance for the elementary campus construction project.

The project involves renovating Sloan Elementary School on Sardis Road in Murrysville into a school serving kindergarten through second grade, and constructing a new school on the Sloan campus for grades 3 to 5.

The work is projected to cost more than $50 million, according to district officials.

PFM and Lynch officials are expected to attend one of the board's October meetings to lay out the parameters of the bond.

If the school board approves a bond resolution, a bond sale could take place in November or December.

In June, the board approved a contract for two land surveys at the Sloan site, as well as a $1 million contract with O'Hara-based Massaro Construction, which will serve as construction manager for the project.

Board member John Koury has said he anticipates breaking ground next year, with the goal of having the new elementary school ready for the 2020-21 school year.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2862, or via Twitter @MurrysvilleStar.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.