ShareThis Page

Kecksburg, Level Green fire charities OK in state aid spending

Joe Napsha
| Thursday, Sept. 28, 2017, 4:16 p.m.
Fire fighters work to extinguish a fire at a single family home at 4084 Greggerson Road, near Level Green in Penn Township, on Monday, Sept. 25, 2017.
Dan Speicher | Tribune-Review
Fire fighters work to extinguish a fire at a single family home at 4084 Greggerson Road, near Level Green in Penn Township, on Monday, Sept. 25, 2017.

Volunteer firefighters relief associations for the Kecksburg and Level Green fire departments properly handled money the organizations received from the state through fire insurance taxes, the Pennsylvania Auditor General's Office said Thursday.

Regular audits found no issues, said Mike Hoover, a spokesman for the Auditor General.

The relief associations are charitable organizations formed primarily to afford financial protection to volunteer firefighters.

Kecksburg's fire relief association in Mt. Pleasant Township received $11,942 in 2015 and $11,917 in 2016 through the fire insurance tax, according to the audit covering January 2015 through December 2016. It spent $30,679 during the audit period and ended 2016 with $8,912 in cash, according to the audit.

The Level Green firefighters relief association in Penn Township corrected the findings from a previous audit when the its fire department reimbursed the relief association $4,629 from an unauthorized expenditure made before January 2014, the state said.

In the audit covering January 2014 through December 2016, the Level Green relief association received $26,689 in 2014, $25,752 in 2015 and $25,685 in 2016. The relief association had $57,093 in cash as of Dec. 31, 2016, the audit found.

The relief association and volunteer fire departments are separate entities. The Auditor General is not authorized to conduct routine audits of the volunteer fire departments financial records, Hoover said.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-5252 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.