ShareThis Page

4 elected to Greensburg Salem school board

Jacob Tierney
| Tuesday, Nov. 7, 2017, 11:00 p.m.
Lynna Thomas
Lynna Thomas
Ron Mellinger
Ron Mellinger
Jeff Metrosky, Greensburg Salem school board candidate
Jeff Metrosky, Greensburg Salem school board candidate
Rachel Shaw
Rachel Shaw

Ronald Mellinger Jr., Rachel Shaw, Jeffrey Metrosky and Lynna Thomas defeated Jonathan O'Brien and Rich Guerrieri in the race for four seats on the Greensburg Salem School Board.

Mellinger, 54, and Shaw, 43, ran on both the Republican and Democratic ballots. Guerrieri, 69, and Thomas, 49, ran as Democrats, while Metrosky, 51, and O'Brien, 46, were on the GOP ticket.

Mellinger received 20.64 percent of the vote; Shaw, 20.10 percent; Metrosky, 15.78 percent; Thomas, 15.43 percent; O'Brien, 14.24 percent; Guerrieri, 13.71 percent

School board members serve four-year terms. The position is unpaid.

Mellinger is the current board president. He's been on the board since 2003, and said he wants to continue striking a balance between educational quality and fiscal responsibility.

Shaw, a business agent for the Service Employees International Union, said the district needs to better appeal to Harrisburg for increased funding.

Metrosky has been on the board almost four years, and said he wants to balance the budget and fight further tax increases.

Thomas, a counselor for Westmoreland County Community College, said she wants to use her background in education to promote communication between the board and the community.

School board members Rick Payha and Barbara Vernail will step down at the end of the year.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-6646, jtierney@tribweb.com or via Twitter @Soolseem.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.