ShareThis Page

Franklin Regional board sets stage to borrow $9.9 million for Sloan Elementary projects

Patrick Varine
| Monday, Oct. 2, 2017, 8:51 p.m.
The Franklin Regional School Board.
File photo
The Franklin Regional School Board.

Franklin Regional School District's financial adviser has recommended the board issue $9.9 million in bonds before the end of the year to begin work on a $54 million elementary campus.

The work would include renovations to Sloan Elementary and the construction of an elementary school next door.

Chris Bamber of PFM Financial Advisors said the board was inclined to look at issuing “bank-qualified bonds” that amortize in roughly 30 years.

Bamber said such bonds generally have lower interest rates and allow any tax increases that may be needed for such a project to be phased in more gradually.

Bamber proposed issuing $9.9 million in bonds next year and in 2020, as well, with a much larger, $23.65 million bond in 2019, when the bulk of construction work and spending would be taking place.

“You want to maximize the use of these bank-qualified bonds,” he said.

As it has done in the past, the board will set parameters for the bonds to give the district maximum flexibility when it comes to entering the market and pricing the bonds at the most opportune time.

Those are:

• Maximum principal of $12 million.

• Maximum interest rate of 5.5 percent.

Bamber said a general timeline would see the district's financing team contact a rating agency next week and receive that rating in mid-October. The board could agree to the bond parameters Oct. 16. Pricing the bonds and executing a bond purchase agreement would happen in late October or early November, and bond settlement would take place by early December.

Patrick Varine is a staff writer for the Tribune-Review. Reach him at 724-850-2862, pvarine@tribweb.com or on Twitter @MurrysvilleStar.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.