ShareThis Page

Gongaware wins first term as district judge in North Huntingdon

Paul Peirce
| Tuesday, Nov. 7, 2017, 10:30 p.m.

Incumbent North Huntingdon District Judge Wayne Gongaware won his first six-year term as district judge in Tuesday's election.

Gongaware, 68, of North Huntingdon, easily defeated newcomer, Kash Snyder, 47, a former North Versailles Township commissioner, taking 89 percent of the votes to Snyder's 11 percent, with 31 of 32 precincts reporting.

The district serves residents in North Huntingdon Township, Irwin and North Irwin boroughs.

Gongaware retired as an assistant district attorney with Westmoreland County in 2016 and was appointed to fill the unexpired term of former district Judge Douglas Weimer Jr., who retired.

A lifelong township resident, Gongaware won both the Democrat and Republican party nominations in the primary. Snyder, a notary public, obtained sufficient signatures from voters to run as a minor party candidate.

Snyder, who lists an address in Irwin as his permanent residence, ran an unsuccessful campaign for district judge in 2015 in nearby North Versailles, Allegheny County, where he owns a home.

The position pays $89,438 a year.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2860, ppeirce@tribweb.com or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.