ShareThis Page

Tip to statewide child abuse hot line leads to arrest of Hempfield woman

Paul Peirce
| Wednesday, Oct. 4, 2017, 2:24 p.m.
Deedee Alice Klingler
Deedee Alice Klingler

A telephone call to a state child abuse hot line resulted in the arrest Wednesday of a Hempfield woman who allegedly abused a young girl.

Deedee A. Klingler, 31, of Hannastown was arraigned on charges of corruption of minors, indecent assault and indecent assault on a child less than 13 years old filed by state police in Greensburg.

Trooper Christopher Cole reported in an affidavit that the alleged victim revealed to a relative that she was abused by Klingler, and the relative reported the alleged incident to ChildLine, a state child abuse hot line.

The alleged victim later told troopers and local child advocates that the abuse began more than a year ago, Cole said in an affidavit.

Cole said Klingler admitted to abusing the child in a recent interview.

“(Klingler) related that she is addicted to sex and has a problem,” Cole wrote in court papers.

Klingler was arraigned before District Judge Mark Mansour, who ordered her held in the Westmoreland County Prison after she failed to post $50,000 bond.

Her preliminary hearing is Oct. 17 before District Judge Anthony Bompiani in Hempfield.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2860, ppeirce@tribweb.com or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.