ShareThis Page

Newsmaker: Lori Grant

Jamie Martines
| Saturday, Oct. 7, 2017, 5:39 p.m.

Noteworthy: The Pennsylvania Health Care Association (PHCA) named Grant the 2017 Assisted Living/Personal Care Executive Director of the Year. She also was one of seven health care professionals to receive the PHCA Hero Award. Grant was recognized for her work in developing and successfully executing an effective emergency disaster plan that helped protect the residents of Newhaven Court at Lindwood. What was once imagined as a worst-case scenario became a reality in 2016, when a sprinkler pipe burst and flooded the facility. Residents were evacuated, and treatment and care were able to continue while they were temporarily housed at a nearby hotel. β€œTo be honest, that day, the staff was the hero. Because they responded quickly and they did what they were trained to do,” Grant said.

Age: 38

Residence: Connellsville, Fayette County

Family: Husband and 4-year-old son

Education: Bachelor's degree in communication and public relations from California University of Pennsylvania

Occupation: Executive director, Newhaven Court at Lindwood

Background: After graduating from college in 2012, Grant moved to Maryland and took an interview for a marketing position at an assisted-living facility. At the time, she didn't really know what the field was about, she said, but quickly discovered that working with the elderly was her calling. The experience changed the way she looked at nursing homes and assisted-living facilities and showed her that these programs could offer new opportunities to residents. After working at the facility in Maryland for 10 years and working her way up to an administrative position, Grant took the job with Newhaven, where she has worked for the last seven years.

Quote: β€œI'm inspired every day by the people I work with. I'm inspired by the residents; I'm inspired by their families.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.