Students individualize school uniforms
By Tory N. Parrish
Published: Wednesday, Aug. 22, 2012, 9:00 p.m.
Increasing numbers of students are wearing school uniforms, but they are breaking out of the lockstep, expressing individuality by wearing colorful tights, leggings, oversized scarves, jewelry, trendy shoes and hairstyles.
“Every year, when they come in the door, I learn …what's the new thing,” said Amy Nixon, head of the middle school at Shady Side Academy in Fox Chapel.
The academy, Winchester Thurston School and other private and public schools in the region give older students more flexibility in wearing uniforms or meeting other requirements of strict dress codes.
Shady Side's pre-kindergarten through fifth-grade students wear traditional uniforms: navy or khaki, nondenim bottoms, and white, navy or yellow collared tops. High school students can wear almost any type of nondenim bottoms and collared shirts.
Sixth- through eighth-graders occupy the middle, not only academically, but sartorially. They have worn leopard-print ballet flats, wildly colored sneakers, and even jeggings — stretchy leggings that look like skinny jeans — under skirts, Nixon said.
“We go around and around with jeggings. We have not forbidden them,” she said.
“I think they give us enough freedom, so it's not boring, but I mean we could have a little more freedom in what we wear,” said Shady Side eighth-grader Claire Holthaus, 13, of Fox Chapel. She said she would like to wear patterned clothing.
At Propel Andrew Street High School, a Munhall charter school that requires uniforms, students express their creativity on their heads, Principal Angela Allie said.
“We have a variety of hairstyles from the young boys and girls, who might dye their hair a certain color, who might wear mohawks, who might wear some very retro hairstyles that are coming back into style now,” she said.
The percentage of public schools requiring uniforms increased from 12 percent in 1999-2000 to 19 percent in 2009-10, according to the U.S. Department of Education. The percentage of principals who reported a strict dress code increased from 47 percent in 1999-2000 to 57 percent.
Advocates say uniforms or dress codes reduce disciplinary problems, and say studies show they improve academic performance. Opponents say the studies are inconclusive and uniforms stifle self-expression.
Sewickley Academy does not have a uniform, but a dress code bans jeans, flip flops and shirts with writing, said Kolia O'Connor, head of school.
“It allows our kids to have a degree of flexibility in how they dress,” he said.
Still, the dress code is strict enough to reduce distractions, said Lorraine Houston of Bradford Woods, a mother of three children whose youngest child is a junior at Sewickley Academy.
“And as many distractions as you can reduce from a young person's life and keep them on task, I think that's a good thing,” said Houston, president of the academy's Home and School Association.
Officials from single-gender schools said students seem not to be as concerned about fashion because they don't feel pressure to impress the opposite sex.
“They're not dressing to impress each other and there are no girls here, so they're not dressing to impress the girls,” said Chris Brueningsen, head master at The Kiski School, a 200-student boys' boarding school in Loyalhanna. Kiski does not have a uniform. Although students must wear jackets, ties and collared shirts, they can be any color.
Tory N. Parrish is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-380-5662 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.