Blaze guts Carroll home
By Chris Buckley
Published: Thursday, Aug. 16, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
Sandy Sutton smelled the smoke before making a terrible discovery.
“I went to pull back the curtain in the hallway and it was nothing but smoke,” Sutton said. “The closer I got to the living room, the worse the smoke was.” Sutton crawled on the floor of her 841 East Main St. home to safety.
“I tried to stay down. I grabbed my medication and got out.” Except for inhaling the smoke, Sutton escaped the blaze Wednesday morning relatively unscathed.
But her home of 20 years was gutted. And while recently in the hospital for surgery, Sutton's home insurance expired, she said.
A state police fire marshal deemed the fire accidental in nature. The cause of the fire was cigarette ashes dumped into a garbage bag, according to the fire marshal.
But Sutton disagreed with that assessment.
“It started in the kitchen. I went into the kitchen and it was nothing but flames. I do not think it had anything to do with me smoking,” Sutton said, lighting a cigarette, hours after the blaze was extinguished.
A passing motorist saw the flames and called 911 shortly before 8 a.m.
Carroll Township, New Eagle, Monongahela, Donora, Valley Inn and Bentleyville firefighters responded as well as Tri-Community Ambulance and Monongahela and Carroll police.
Route 837 between Monongahela and Donora was shut down until 10.
Southwestern Pennsylvania Human Services protective services were on the scene and are providing Sutton with assistance. Officials are attempting to provide housing for the fire victim.
“I knew I had to get out now,” Sutton said. “The flames were up in a couple of minutes and the whole kitchen was on fire.”
Chris Buckley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2642 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.