St. Alphonsus students pump up American Heart Association
By David Mcelhinny
Published: Wednesday, Oct. 3, 2012, 9:30 p.m.
The St. Alphonsus School community in Wexford recently donated more than $2,500 to the American Heart Association and also walked with “Luke's Team” at the recent Cranberry Heart Walk fundraiser. “Luke's Team” is named for Luke Ball, a second grade student and heart transplant recipient at the school. According to his parents, John and Stacie Ball of Cranberry, Luke is alive today as a result of the many medical and technological improvements that were driven by the American Heart Association.
St. Alphonsus has rallied behind the Ball family to support them and the American Heart Association for the past two years. This year, more than 100 parents, students, faculty and staff participated in the Cranberry Heart Walk. In addition, the Friday before the event, students donated $1 each to be out of school uniform (a “dress down” day), which became part of the school community's contribution.
Now a healthy eight-year-old boy, Luke faced impossible survival odds at birth. Born with a congenital heart defect, he underwent two surgeries before his first birthday while living in Oregon. Realizing that their son would need significant, ongoing medical care, John and Stacie moved their family to Cranberry Township in 2008 so that Luke could be treated at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh. He spent a lot of time in and out of the hospital, ultimately receiving a heart transplant on Dec. 29, 2010 - a Christmas miracle.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.