Firm pitches energy-conservation training for Penn-Trafford
A Texas-based energy-conservation firm estimates it could help Penn-Trafford School District save money on utility bills without any upfront costs.
Ross Kelly, vice president of Energy Education, gave an hourlong presentation at the school board's Oct. 1 meeting to outline the potential benefits of a contract geared toward reducing the district's energy costs.
The district wouldn't have any initial expenses or be required to buy any new equipment, Kelly said. Instead, Energy Education would help Penn-Trafford train a district employee to serve as an energy specialist to help identify the waste in the district's current energy consumption.
Though the district would have to spend money for the training and energy-accounting software, the first-year savings could be around $116,000, Kelly said. The savings could reach $3 million over 10 years, he said.
If the program fails to save the district money, the firm covers the training, software and any other costs.
“Any dollar you spend that does not generate savings, we're on the hook for,” Kelly said.
Norwin, Mt. Lebanon, Seneca Valley and South Butler County school districts are among the 20 Pennsylvania districts that have contracted with the firm. Across the country, about 1,200 districts are clients.
In all but seven cases nationwide, the energy program produced savings for the districts in the first year, Kelly said.
Norwin officials in April reported they saved $165,000 through a 15-percent reduction in energy use during a nine-month period.
Participation in the program enables clients to use the firm's team of engineers to help monitor the maintenance of their equipment. The firm's experts would visit the district buildings as often as 20 times a month in the first six months of the program.
“That could be a big plus,” school board member Nick Petrucci said.
Much of the savings would result simply from encouraging employees to modify their habits, such as turning equipment off when it's not in use. Kelly said one-third of the district's energy consumption might be considered unnecessary.
The offer of the program comes on the heels of the school board workshop last month to brainstorm ways to reduce costs.
Superintendent Tom Butler, who met with Kelly on two occasions before the meeting, said the board now will have to decide whether it would like to tour Norwin's or Mt. Lebanon's buildings to help to determine if it should hire Energy Education.
The firm charges a 12.5-percent fee of estimated savings over 10 years, but the fee is paid during the first four years. The accounting program, designed by a company based in State College factors utility-rate changes and weather conditions into the utility costs to ensure Energy Education isn't being credited for lower rates or mild winters, Kelly said.
“Our goal is to never be in a debate with our client as to what the savings were,” he said.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.