Paraglider crashes in North Huntingdon
By Joe Napsha
Published: Saturday, Sept. 29, 2012, 4:26 p.m.
Two men were injured Saturday afternoon when the paraglider they were riding crashed into the woods in a remote hilltop in the Ardara section of North Huntingdon.
One of the men was transported by ambulance to an area hospital and another was flown by medical helicopter to a trauma center in Pittsburgh, said Robert Leuthold, a North Huntingdon EMS/Rescue paramedic who was involved in the rescue.
North Huntingdon police Sgt. Duane Kucera said he did not know the identities of those injured in the crash.
The paraglider, which has a parachute attached to a frame holding an open-air seat and engine, crashed at 3:58 p.m. in an area about 50 yards off Nehrig Hill Road. The parachute that is inflated above the paraglider was hanging in trees adjacent to the engine.
Rescuers found the men on the ground, but close to the edge of a 30-foot dropoff above a dirt road. It took emergency personnel about 15 minutes to place the injured men in wire-mesh Stokes baskets and lower them to the ground, said Jason Fait, a member of the Penn Township Ambulance-North Huntingdon EMS/Rescue Technical Rescue Division.
Kucera said that the Federal Aviation Administration was notified of the accident.
Leuthold said they were told that the men riding in the paraglider were going to a birthday party in the area and were looking for a nearby level field to land when they crashed.
One Nehrig Hill Road resident, Joseph Popovich, said he had heard the propeller from the paraglider flying overhead for a while then heard a bang.
“I thought someone in an ATV had come out (of the woods) and hit a car,” Popovich said.
Joe Napsha is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-5252 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.