Highmark-Jefferson Regional Medical Center deal still intact
One Highmark affiliation agreement apparently still is proceeding despite the reported breakdown of another.
“The affiliation agreement entered into between Highmark and Jefferson Regional is independent of any issues between Highmark and West Penn Allegheny Health System,” Jefferson Regional Medical Center officials said Friday in response to West Penn Allegheny's announcement that it is severing ties with Highmark.
“We do not anticipate any change in course as we continue to move forward in obtaining the regulatory approvals needed to finalize our affiliation with Highmark,” the brief statement concluded.
In June, officials at the Jefferson Hills hospital agreed to a strategic partnership with Highmark, the area's largest medical insurance provider, which in return would get 75 percent of the seats on Jefferson's board.
Highmark pledged to give Jefferson's foundation $75 million, spend up to $100 million on upgrades that would include the hospital's emergency room, and assume approximately $200 million in debt and pension obligations.
Ten months earlier, Jefferson CEO John J. Dempster stressed a need for independent hospitals in the Pittsburgh area to not “get caught up in the fight” between Highmark and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center that was aggravated by Highmark's deal with West Penn Allegheny.
“I think our future is still in community care,” Dempster told the 2011 community recognition dinner at Jefferson, an annual event started after the merger of Homestead and St. Joseph's hospitals that led to creation of Jefferson.
At the time Dempster said his hospital would “reach out to the other community hospitals that are still independent,” including St. Clair, Mon Valley and Washington hospitals, and Heritage Valley, Butler and Excela health systems.
At this year's dinner, Dempster defended the Highmark tie, saying the South Hills hospital is strong, but “to remain strong into the future we needed a partner with the same vision.”
Patrick Cloonan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161 ext. 1967 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Rossi: Looking at the next great Steeler
- Steelers swap draft pick for Eagles cornerback
- After early criticism, Haley has Steelers offense poised to be even better
- Starting 9: Examining Pirates’ deadline decisions
- McCullers’, McLendon’s prowess in clogging trenches crucial to Steelers defense
- Reds solve Cole, stave off Pirates’ 9th-inning rally
- Pirates notebook: New acquisition Happ more than happy to fill spot in rotation
- Penguins not alone in top-heavy approach to salary cap
- Shell shovels millions into proposed Beaver County plant site
- Roman Catholic Church in midst of culture clash over gays
- Steelers notebook: Injuries finally become issue at training camp