Gilpin man killed changing tire on Route 28
By Chuck Biedka
Published: Wednesday, Oct. 3, 2012, 10:24 a.m.
A Gilpin man died just before 4 a.m. Wednesday while trying to change a flat tire at the Tarentum exit of northbound Route 28.
State police and a deputy Allegheny County medical examiner said Kevin Eshelman, 24, of Lessing Road, died at the scene.
Police said Eshelman's friend, Chad Akins, 26, of Apollo, also was struck by the vehicle. He was in fair condition late Wednesday morning in Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh.
County 911 said the accident was reported at 3:49 a.m.
Trooper Ronald D. Kesten said Eshelman called Akins to help with the flat, and Akins parked his Jeep in front of Eshelman's car, along the berm, someone time before the accident.
Police said Eshelman and Akins were struck by an Audi driven by Thomas James Walters, 23, of Brackenridge.
The Audi hit the Jeep before coming to a stop on the northbound Tarentum exit (Exit 14).
Kesten said Walters was interviewed by police and left with a relative.
Kesten said an accident reconstruction will reveal how far into the lane the men were when hit, how fast Walters was driving, any roadway or other factors.
It's unclear when the review will be completed.
The accident closed Route 28 northbound between the Creighton (Exit 13) and Tarentum exits through the morning rush hour. The diverted traffic clogged the parallel Freeport Road until nearly 10 a.m.
Some lesser accidents were reported in Tarentum during rush hour.
About eight state troopers were assisted by police from Tarentum, Frazer, Harrison, Fawn, Brackenridge as well as firefighters from Tarentum and East Deer and Eureka emergency medical services.
Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4711 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.