Murrysville Council reviews criteria for accepting new roads
Slow development on housing plans has driven Murrysville officials to reconsider their criteria for accepting ownership of new roads.
One month after voting against accepting responsibility for roads in two housing plans, officials agreed that ideally 75 percent of a development will be complete before its road are accepted into the municipal street plan.
“When should Murrysville accept roads?” engineer Joe Dietrick said. “I guess the answer is whenever we want to, so long as they're structurally sound and aesthetically pleasing.”
Once a road is accepted, the municipality is responsible for its snow removal, crack sealing, pothole patching and paving. Only then may police enforce stop signs and speed limit postings, Chief Administrator Jim Morrison said.
Roads are not accepted until the final 1.5-inches of blacktop are laid. Officials are worried about accepting roads from developments that have a limited number of homes built and occupied.
Current regulations require that 85 percent of homes be constructed before roads are accepted. Council instructed Morrison to make changes to the regulations for a vote later this year. Dietrick estimated that most developments that used to take two years to complete will take at least five years in the current economy.
Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8627, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.