Fire damages vacant Monessen house
By Rick Bruni Jr.
Published: Friday, Oct. 5, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
A Thursday morning fire inside an unoccupied Monessen house apparently started in the basement, according to Monessen Municipal Fire Chief Delmar Hepple.
The gold-brick house at 324 Oneida Street sustained moderate damage to its floors and walls when a fire broke out around 1:22 a.m., Hepple said.
A fire marshal had not yet determined the cause as of Thursday evening.
The basement's concrete flooring was charred black with a wide gash opened in the center of the ceiling through the first-level flooring.
The fire could have been a lot worse, Hepple said, because of the structure's balloon framing.
“(The fire) actually ran inside the walls and the floors, so we had to go to every floor and open up the walls,” Hepple said. “It was one of those fires that was breathing. It was a heck of a stop because it was in the center of the building and we had to work for it. It was very hot, very smoky.”
The home is a rental property and currently unoccupied and unfurnished, Hepple said. Firefighters from both Monessen companies, Rostraver No. 1, Lock Four and Donora responded. They initially had trouble navigating the narrow, steep hillside of Oneida Street.
“We had a couple difficulties working on the steep hill and recovered nicely,” Hepple said. “Everyone went home unharmed and that's the best thing that could happen.”
Rick Bruni Jr. is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 724-684-2635.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.