Greensburg OKs tax settlement on state building
Greensburg council approved on Monday a proposed tax settlement that would bring about $100,000 to the city.
Council, the Greensburg Salem School District and Westmoreland County reached the proposal with Columbia Greensburg SPE, owner of the state office building and an adjoining parking lot on North Main Street.
A county judge must approve the settlement before it takes effect.
Under the proposal, Columbia's assessment amounts go up for each year between 2009 and 2013.
Columbia would pay $99,862 over a two-year period to the city to cover additional taxes owed for the 2009-12 period, city officials said.
Columbia is receiving a 2 percent reduction on those payments, rather than paying face value, which would cost more, city officials said.
Columbia's payment would equal $4,160 per month and start 60 days after a county judge approves the settlement, said city fiscal director Mary Perez.
Officials have assessed the building at about $2 million for 2013 as part of the settlement.
The county assessment board had previously assessed the properties for $1.3 million for each of the five years. School district officials appealed that assessment.
The new assessment amounts are $2.4 million for 2009 and 2010; $2.3 million for 2011; and $2.1 million for 2012, according to city records.
In another matter, the city has reached a financial agreement with Dollar Bank for the purchase of a $48,960 dump truck for the street department.
The city will make an annual payment of $10,695 over a five-year period, using liquid fuels money.
Council approved buying the truck this past summer.
Bob Stiles is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-6622 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.