Zetty welcomes ideas, vows to keep parents informed
When Superintendent Nina Zetty leaves Peters Township School District to begin her tenure at Gateway, she plans to keep an open mind in an effort to improve the district's academic standing.
Zetty says fresh ideas are welcome from anyone — administrators, teachers, cafeteria workers and janitors — and she says she plans to keep parents informed of major changes as they're discussed by school officials, Zetty said.
“I try to be proactive and involve parents in the decision making from the onset,” she said.
“When they have ownership in the decision making, the results tend to be much better … maybe (parents) have better ideas than we do.”
But she also owns her role as an academic expert and a proven leader.
“I'm not concerned about parent opposition to anything that I do,” she said. “You don't always end up loving each other at the end.”
She said the best part of being a superintendent is seeing first-hand the impact of good decisions, while the worst part is seeing the negative impact of some decisions.
But according to former colleagues and those who interviewed Zetty for the job, the majority of her decisions as a superintendent have been good ones.
Prior to being hired as assistant superintendent and then superintendent at Peters Township, Zetty was principal at Bentworth High School in Washington County, principal at Keystone Oaks High School in Allegheny County and a math and computer science teacher at Jefferson Morgan School District in Greene County.
Under her leadership, Peters Township was ranked 11th academically in the state this year by the Pittsburgh Business Times and has met state standards for at least the last two years. Gateway is ranked 123 in the state and failed to meet state standards as a district this year. The high school failed to meet standards the last two years.
Zetty said the academic disparity is one of the reasons she applied for the position at Gateway.
“Right now, (Peters Township) is at the top of their game academically and moving forward,” she said.
“Every educator has to feel like he or she is making a difference.”
There also is an economic disparity.
While 37.5 percent of Gateway students received free or reduced lunches in the 2011-12 school year, only 3.6 percent of Peters Township students were enrolled in the same program, according to the state department of education.
“Finances make a difference,” Zetty said. “You can't really go to your taxpayers (in Gateway) like you can in Peters.”
In addition to the new pay-to-play policy at Gateway, Zetty said she'll discuss fundraising opportunities with parent booster groups and will look toward the local business district for contributions.
“I'll look at how we do things,” she said. “A lot of times a set of fresh eyes can see new things.”
Kyle Lawson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8755, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.