Preliminary budget keeps Aspinwall tax rate steady
Aspinwall residents won't see a tax-rate increase next year if the borough's 2013 preliminary budget is approved.
The budget was advertised last week. A final vote is expected at the Dec. 12 council meeting.
The $1.98 million budget includes a $6,000 surplus. Last year's budget was about $1.94 million.
The 2013 plan will include funding for a full-time borough manager. Ed Warchol has been serving as a part-time manager since late 2011. He retired from the borough earlier that year but his replacement, April Winklmann, resigned after nine months in the position.
The preliminary budget includes $43,000 for that position, up from $29,000 that was budgeted this year.
Warchol said 13 resumes have been received for the position. The deadline to apply is Dec. 23.
Councilman Kevin Gordon, who chairs the finance committee, said officials will review those resumes later in the year.
“We haven't even looked at them. We'll open them up once the deadline has passed,” Gordon said.
Borough officials also are considering a new ticketing software system, Gordon said, but have not yet discussed if one is needed with the borough's parking enforcement officer.
The police budget is the largest line item at $550,800. The borough will get most of its revenue from property taxes at more than $1 million.
Gordon advised his fellow council members to review the budgets for their respective committees and provide any feedback or discussion items if necessary.
“We need feedback starting next week,” Gordon said.
Gordon said he was pleased with the budget.
“Overall the budget looks very good,” Gordon said.
The Dec. 12 meeting will begin at 7 p.m. at the borough building at 217 Commercial Ave.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.