Manor officials look to add employees, hold line on taxes
Manor officials say they anticipate hiring another full-time police officer and a public-works employee in 2013 without raising property taxes.
Manor Council is advertising a budget that features $1.06 million in spending but would keep the tax rate at 16.5 mills. Final approval is expected at the Dec. 19 public meeting.
Despite the proposed hiring of two new employees, officials are projecting that the borough will spend $21,300 less next year. They estimate collecting $16,350 more in revenue and having a cash balance of nearly $279,000 at the end of 2013.
Though Manor will have a third full-time police officer, the department's costs will increase by only $853 to $294,550 because the borough will spend about $43,000 less on wages for part-time officers. That expense could go down by another $6,000 for health insurance if the officer is single and doesn't need a family plan, Manager Joe Lapia said.
A third full-time public-works employee would help to boost that department's expenses by almost $13,000 to $183,287.
Meanwhile, the borough's general fund won't be saddled with expenses for the replacement of stormwater sewer lines, like the $40,000 budgeted in 2012. Costs associated with a $3.07-million sewer infrastructure project will be covered by a state loan and federal grant.
Officials also estimate saving $13,000 on worker's compensation insurance next year.
One outstanding issue is Lapia's salary, which was $34,000 this year. The proposed budget lists his 2013 compensation at $37,000, but council members have said they will vote separately on it.
“We'll have to come up with those numbers,” Councilman Brian Woy said.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400 ext. 8671 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.