Riverview eyes policy on volunteers
The Riverview School District will consider adoption of a policy for volunteers.
The school board on Monday night began reviewing volunteer policies from several other school districts.
“We want to encourage continued parental involvement to serve the needs of students,” said Superintendent Margaret DiNinno. “But we need very specific guidelines, and we need to see what Riverview needs.”
The districts whose policies are under review all broke down volunteers by different categories.
Some had frequent volunteers, such as an assistant athletic trainer, who would interact with students frequently.
Another definition describes casual volunteers, who don't have unsupervised contact with students, such as guest speakers and concert ushers.
Other volunteers include those who coach an athletic team, serve as band chaperones on buses to events and musical choreographers who provide instruction with students.
Some would need background clearances for convictions such as child abuse, criminal behavior, or, some would have to have fingerprints on file.
The board will begin to discuss volunteer issues on Monday.
DiNinno said any policy formulated by the school board would be reviewed by the solicitor.
No date of final adoption has been set.
Class make-up day set
• District officials said the school day missed in late October because of Hurricane Sandy will be made up on Monday, Feb. 18.
George Guido is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.