Visitor shot in New Kensington town house
New Kensington police were investigating the Wednesday night shooting of a man who was visiting the Willow Court town houses behind city hall.
Detective Robert Deringer said the man, believed to be in his late teens or early 20s, was inside one of the units when a single shot was fired through an open window about 10:15 p.m.
The man, whose identity police had not yet confirmed, was shot in the abdomen and flown to a Pittsburgh hospital. He was conscious and alert when he left New Kensington; his condition was not available at press time.
Deringer said the man was visiting a woman who lived in one of the units adjacent to the JFK Playground.
Since the unit faces a pedestrian-only courtyard, Deringer said it's likely the shooter was on foot.
Police were knocking on doors of neighboring apartments and canvassing the area, but they had not yet located any witnesses and didn't have a description of the alleged shooter by late Wednesday.
Although the apartment's window was open, the shot was fired through a blind.
Deringer said several of the Willow Court units, including those facing the shooting scene, are vacant. Few people were out in the cold temperatures.
“We really don't have a lot to go on,” Deringer said.
Bonnie Emerick, who lives nearby in Willow Court, said a person in her unit heard a gunshot.
“Around here you never know what it is when you hear it,” said Emerick, who has lived there for seven years.
Emerick said she had just returned home when she saw a person being carried out on a stretcher.
“After last week's fire, I started panicking. What is going on?” she asked.
One of the town houses, which are owned by the Westmoreland County Housing Authority, was destroyed by fire on Friday.
Deringer said he was unaware of any recent criminal complaints at the unit involved in the shooting, but he noted crime was not uncommon in the housing plan.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.