Pittsburgh man peddled heroin, police say
A Pittsburgh man is accused of selling heroin on both sides of the Tarentum Bridge.
Jarrell George “Rail” Miller, 27, of Langtry Street is suspected of selling heroin twice last month in Tarentum and a third time in New Kensington.
According to arrest papers, New Kensington police found 112 packets of heroin on Miller last month at a gas station along Tarentum Bridge Road in New Kensington.
Most of the packets were marked “More Pain” and the rest “XXX.”
While being fingerprinted, Miller allegedly told New Kensington police Sgt. Sam Long, “I never been caught with this much ‘work' before man.” Police said “work” is slang for drugs.
Miller also is facing charges filed by the Alle-gheny County District Attorney Drug Task Force and Tarentum police. He is accused of selling 20 packets of heroin, marked “pinky dinky,” to an informant in Tarentum for $160.
In the other Tarentum case, he is accused of selling 60 stamp bags for $480.
He is facing multiple counts of drug possession, drug delivery, using a phone to sell drugs, driving without a license, and driving while his license is suspended or revoked.
On Wednesday, Miller was in the Westmoreland County jail in lieu of $75,000 cash bond awaiting a preliminary hearing next Thursday in New Kensington on drug related charges.
Miller is scheduled to have a preliminary hearing for the Tarentum cases on Wednesday before Brackenridge District Judge Carolyn Bengel.
Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4711 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.