School board institutes fees for cyber, charter student activity participation
Charter and cyber-school students are welcome to participate in Penn Hills School District sports or extracurricular activities — but it's going to cost their schools.
The Penn Hills school board on Nov. 12 unanimously approved a new policy that sets a fee schedule for participation in activities and athletics, to the tune of:
• Activities, $100 per student;
• Marching band, $500 per student;
• Musicals, $500 per student;
• Interscholastic sports excluding football, $250 per student; and
• Football, $500 per student.
Cyber or charter students must be residents of the district to be eligible to participate, and the activity or sport must not already be offered at their current school.
There is not a similar fee in place for students who attend Penn Hills School District schools, according to district spokesperson Teresita Kolenchak.
Different districts handle the situation in different ways. In the Norwin School District, students who live within the district's borders but attend a cyber or charter school are permitted to participate in Norwin activities and athletics.
In the Hampton School District, officials created their own cyber-charter school to give students the option to participate in extracurriculars, school dances and athletics while still attending a cyber program.
In Penn Hills, district officials will also develop a procedure to ensure that charter and cyber students have access to information regarding the district's extracurricular activities and athletic programs through the main website, www.PHSD.k12.pa.us.
Patrick Varine is an editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7845 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.