After giving OK for VFD practice on Trafford property, owner wants payment
The owner of a First Street property wants Trafford Borough to pay him for damage caused when volunteer firefighters practiced techniques on his dilapidated buildings or pay for the demolition of the structures.
Jim Bruno gave permission for the Trafford firefighters to use the buildings, but he's now unable to pay for their demolition, his attorney, Bill Bercik, told borough officials at the Nov. 20 council meeting.
But solicitor Craig Alexander said Bruno has filed tax-assessment appeals to Westmoreland County alleging the one-third of an acre property is worth nothing.
“We're not prepared, at this time, to offer any money for Mr. Bruno's property,” he said.
Bruno, who is a cousin of Councilman Frank Bruno, wants to use the property to build townhouses, Bercik said.
Trafford Council President Rich Laird and volunteer fire Chief Brian Lindbloom had a brief, heated exchange last week about Lindbloom's decision not to let two teens into the yet-to-open fire station during an August storm.
Laird brought up the Aug. 10 situation to follow up on a complaint lodged in September by Leigh Ann Geckle, the mother of one of the teens.
Lindbloom said the firefighters had been admonished by borough officials for being in the new station on Brinton Avenue before it was open for fire calls, but he was there to build some lockers.
Shortly after Geckle's son knocked on the door, Trafford firefighters were called to help at two structure fires in Level Green, Lindbloom said.
“We're not taking a child or some person that I don't know into a building that we're not authorized to be in,” he said.
Lindbloom said he directed the boy to go to the police station, which is in the same municipal complex. The police fully moved into the new building in late July.
But Laird said he doubted that the public works department or Trafford Emergency Medical Services would have left the teens outside.
“You don't turn kids loose out in the street in a storm and not give them shelter,” he said.
Geckle, who lives on Duquesne Avenue, told council in September that she just wanted to make sure an incident like that never happens again.
Code officer resigns
A part-time-code enforcement officer is leaving after a couple of months on the job.
Council accepted Bob Chappo's resignation and will advertise for a replacement.
When Chappo was hired in September, council increased the position's pay by $5.50 an hour to $23.
Chappo, who was sharing duties with Mark Lazzaro, gave his two weeks' notice on Nov. 19.
Mayor Rey Peduzzi said he has been meeting with police Capt. Carmen Disso about stepping up enforcement of stop-sign violations.
“People totally ignore stop signs, and it's at the point where it's an epidemic,” Peduzzi said. “It's a wonder no one has been killed yet.”
Councilwoman Vicki Megon said some drivers also have been ignoring the new stoplight at the intersection of Fifth Street and Brinton Avenue. The light was installed as part of the improvements related to the construction of the new Trafford Veterans Memorial Bridge.
“We're really going to crack down on it,” Peduzzi said.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.