Grant could help upgrade Sharpsburg lights
Sharpsburg officials hope grant money will be able to help them update lighting in the borough.
Schaedler Yesco has made a proposal to the borough to update lights.
Borough secretary Jan Barbus said at a council meeting earlier this month the cost would be $550 per lamp. LED lights would replace the ones the borough currently uses.
Council President Renee Procopio said while the plan is worthy to consider, funding is likely unavailable.
Grant money could be available from Duquesne Light to replace the lamps, Barbus said. Schaedler Yesco representatives could help the borough with funding.
“They'd be willing to work with us to get these grants,” Barbus said.
It is unknown if the grant would require a matching portion. Procopio said with the 2013 budget being finalized, that could help decide if the borough takes any further action. The budget is expected to be tight.
“I don't know that there's a match in there,” Procopio said.
Barbus was asked to research the available grants to determine if a match is needed. If funding from the borough is required, the project could wait until 2014.
The addition of LED lights could be more cost effective for the borough, Councilman Tony Sacco said.
“It's going to be a lot cheaper to operate the LED lights than the ones we have now,” Sacco said.
Sacco noted that the borough has money from insurance claims for damaged light poles that could be used for a grant match if needed.
The borough previously bought three decorative light poles from Schaedler Yesco with that money for $15,500.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.