November one of the driest
November 2012 was historically dry.
“We had just 0.38-inch of precipitation for the whole month,” said Brad Rehak, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service Pittsburgh. “Normally we see 3.23 inches of precipitation in November.”
Rehak said the low amount of precipitation — rain or snow — places the month third all-time.
“The driest November ever recorded was November of 1904 when the area only saw 0.22-inch of precipitation,” he said.
Rehak said November 2012 was also the 11th driest month ever recorded.
“October of 1874 was the driest month ever recorded,” he said. “There was only .006-inch of precipitation that month.”
Rehak said only 0.08-inch of the month's precipitation came from snow. In November 2011, it didn't snow at all, according to the National Weather Service.
A normal November sees about 2 inches of snowfall.
Despite November's historic low, the area is still above normal precipitation levels for the year.
“We're at 36.21 inches this year,” he said. “Normal is 35.34.”
In terms of temperatures, the month was unusually cold, Rehak said.
“Our average temperature was 39.6 degrees,” he said. “That's about 2.3 degrees lower than the normal average temperature of 42.9.”
Some folks may remember the coldest November ever, which was set in 1976, with an average temperature of 33.1 degrees.
Rehak said folks should enjoy the warm front that's moving in this weekend, because it won't last long.
“We probably won't get back to seasonable temperatures until the middle of next week,” he said. “Even at that point, it doesn't look like it will be very cold for the next few weeks.
“But, we're still predicting a normal winter,” he said. “Normal precipitation and temperatures.”
R.A. Monti is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.