Odor still vexes Harmar residents
Allegheny Valley Joint Sanitary Authority officials are hoping the odor problem at the sewage treatment plant in Harmar will be cleared up in about six weeks.
Several more residents filed complaints with the Allegheny County Health Department related to the odors, which have lasted through the summer and much of the fall.
Authority board members feel the right type of bacteria is being grown to solve the problem.
The bacteria is being maintained at about 95 degrees and officials said the chemical combination to produce the right type of methane gas isn't at the right level yet to treat the odor.
Authority general manager Rich Chiavaretta said he is keeping county health department officials appraised of the situation.
In other business
• The authority plans to unveil its budget on Dec. 13.
The fiscal year for the authority lasts from Feb. 1 to Jan. 31.
The authority board will reorganize Dec. 13 at 7 p.m., followed by its regular meeting at 7:30.
Board members represent Springdale, Springdale Township, Cheswick and Harmar.
Each year, the four board members are augmented by an extra member from each of the municipalities on a rotating basis to form a five-member board.
Next year, the extra seat will be held by Harmar.
George Guido is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.