Hampton names new interim chief of police
Michael C. Pecora, 54, left, has been named as Hampton Township's new interim chief of police, replacing Dan Connolly, 63, right, who is retiring.
Photo by Deborah Deasy | Pine Creek Journal
Michael C. Pecora, 54, of Richland is Hampton Township's new interim chief of police.
Hampton Council unanimously appointed Pecora to the job on Nov. 28 to replace retiring police chief Dan Connolly.
Connolly, 63, of McCandless, officially will retire Dec. 31, but vacated his office on Nov. 21 to use vacation time.
Pecora is a 1976 graduate of North Allegheny High School with a bachelor's degree in business administration from La Roche College.
Pecora sold overhead hoists and cranes for Follansbee & Gruner, Sharpsburg, before he joined the Hampton Police Department on Jan. 4, 1984.
“His passion was to get into police work. That's what I recall. He was a good fellow. He worked well,” said Bob Stewart, president and owner of Follansbee & Gruner. “Tell him (Pecora) ‘Congratulations,' and if they ever need a hoist at the police station, we're still here.”
Pecora is a single dad with two children: Air Force Sgt. Joseph Pecora, 28, of Colorado Springs, Colo., and Amber Pecora, 22, who works in the human resources department of Chicago's public school system.
About 160 family members, Hampton employees and friends honored Connolly, a one-time Washington, D.C. policeman, on Nov. 24 at a buffet dinner in Hampton Community Center. Connolly's family and Hampton Township hosted the event.
Deborah Deasy is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at email@example.com
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.