Tradeoff opens way for Upper St. Clair labor agreement
The union representing Upper St. Clair School District teachers has reached an agreement with the district that will roll salaries back to 2009-10 levels this year in exchange for a guarantee that the district won't furlough any teachers for the next two years, officials said.
The Upper St. Clair Education Association and the school board approved a new contract late last week, even though the previous contract wasn't set to expire until 2013-14.
The contract, expected to save the district $3.7 million in its first two years, will help close an anticipated $3.2 million deficit in 2012-13 that previously led administrators to consider furloughing up to 30 employees and not replacing 14 others who planned to retire at the end of the year.
"It really helps the district with its budget going forward," Superintendent Patrick O'Toole said. "We still have challenges ahead with our pensions and reductions in state and federal assistance."
Under the agreement, salaries for 2012-13 will drop back to 2009-10 levels, gradually returning to current levels by the end of the new contract in 2016, O'Toole said.
It also provides a $15,000 cash bonus for any eligible professional who retires in the next four years, reduces money available for teachers' tuition reimbursement, increases employee contributions toward health insurance, and reduces the number of teacher in-service days from 14 to 11.
"The budget crisis we are facing can only be addressed through a concerted effort by the staff, administration, and community, each willing to make difficult decisions that serve the best interests of the students," Upper St. Clair Education Association president-elect Patrick Manion said in a statement issued following Friday's agreement.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.